
The new Miss Surrey, Chloe Marshall is in the final of the Miss England and her figure is stirring up a storm. Not, you may think, because of it's fabulous proportions, but because some people are disgusted that she was allowed to enter the pageant in the first place.
A selection of disgraceful comments from an un-named daily newspaper:
This either reflects very badly upon the other women of Surrey that were competing if she won, (which I'm sure it doesn't) or the competition judges whom are just being overly politically correct by bestowing her with the Miss Surrey title. A laughing stock either way though.
Are we now going to get token fat girls in all beauty competitions and maybe under 5ft ones and over 6ft ones - and maybe bald headed ones or even one legged ones?
Granted she has a pretty face, but she is FAT. Not curvy nor voluptuous (and certainly no size 16). Sorry to put it bluntly, but this country is in the middle of an obesity crisis and this is not helping. That is an unhealthy size for a teenage girl!
Curvy? No. That's fat. There's a difference.
Am I the only one who thinks she's too big to be Miss England? I don't think a 16 year old who is that size can be a healthy eater.
Ok, so maybe Chloe is overweight but she seems happy that way. People are disguising their distaste by pointing out that she is a bad role model.
To be honest, I am heartily sick of the whole issue.
On another note though, she would have looked a hundred times better in a sculpted swimsuit with a fake tan and some glamorous jewellery. The bikini looks tacky and does absolutley nothing to flatter her.
1 comment:
Sigh. Maybe someday people will expand their definitions of beauty to encompass something other than rail-thin chicks. It's encouraging that this girl won for her region, but sad and angering that the public reacted with such scorn. Thanks for posting this.
Post a Comment